Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

AYM: “Lawyer restriction against Constitution, no matter how legal”

by Dusun-Think 30/07/2018
30/07/2018 1693 views

Constitutional Court (AYM) issued that the application of restriction on lawyer access is against the Constitution, even though it is issued based on the law. In the application of Hasan Demir, Fazıl Ahmet Tamer and Erol Kalan, the application to receive defendant testimony without a counsel was found to be violating ‘the right to fair trial’ and ‘the presumption of innocence.’ The court issued a retrial.

 

Kaplan, Tamer and Demir had been taken into custody in 1994 and remained under arrest for 7 years, later convicted by the State Security Court due to ‘attempting to overthrow the Constitutional order by force.’ The Court had claimed that they had “confessed” their crimes while testifying.

 

On the other hand, AYM issued that the 4.25 squared-meter area per convict, including common life zones like kitchen and open air spaces, is sufficient. Therefore, AYM found the application of Mehmet Hani Baki, who is on trial within the “FETÖ” case, unacceptable. Baki had applied to the high court, indicating that they are staying 25 people in the prison ward that contained only 16 bunk beds and that he has to sleep on the floor.

 

30.07.2018

 

cumhuriyet.com.tr

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
STATE OF EMERGENCY IS NOT OVER BUT PERMANENT
Sonraki Post
Investigation against Baran Tursun Foundation Chairman due to TCK Article 301

You May Also Like

On July 7, he will appear before the...

08/05/2025

Trial of 3 journalists postponed

08/05/2025

Goethe Medal to Osman Kavala from Germany

08/05/2025

Journalist Sadık Topaloğlu’s trial postponed

08/05/2025

Witness to be heard in journalist Nurcan Yalçın’s...

08/05/2025

Journalists Ercüment Akdeniz and Yıldız Tar charged with...

08/05/2025

Journalist Ayşenur Arslan acquitted

08/05/2025

Erdogan: Anyone who picks up a microphone and...

08/05/2025

A lawsuit was filed against presenter Ece Üner:...

08/05/2025

Views of ‘justice’ from Turkey: Attackers of Halk...

08/05/2025

Press organizations in front of the Ministry of...

08/05/2025

TGS Press Freedom Report was announced: “Free journalism...

08/05/2025

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun.sanaryurdatapan.com